Alternative Sentencing : Statement Prepared for the United States Sentencing Commission
نویسنده
چکیده
I appreciate the opportunity to testify before the United States Sentencing Commission regarding alternatives to incarceration. My remarks are intended as practical observations based on: (a) experience gained in my current position as Director of a community corrections program that provides reentry services to persons formerly incarcerated in Federal prisons, and that also serves as an alternative to incarceration for persons under the supervision of the United States Probation Office; and (b) previous experience in a court services department of the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, overseeing programs that provided non-custodial interventions for persons with substance abuse or mental health issues, and for perpetrators of domestic or family violence, as well as serving on a team that created and implemented the program design for a Drug Court.
منابع مشابه
Statement of Diana E. Murphy before the Senate Subcommittee
Chairman Biden, members of the Subcommittee, I am Diana Murphy, Chair of the United States Sentencing Commission (the " Commission ") and a judge on the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. I appreciate the opportunity to testify today about federal cocaine sentencing policy, and the Subcommittee should be commended for holding this important hearing. Although Congress and the Commission have been ...
متن کاملStrategic Judging Under the United States Sentencing Guidelines: Positive Political Theory and Evidence
We present a positive political theory of criminal sentencing and test it using data from the United States Sentencing Commission. Under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, judges can use “offense-level adjustments” (fact-based decisionmaking) to lengthen or shorten the Guidelines’ presumptive sentences. Judges also can use “departures” from the Guidelines (law-based decisionmaking) to lengthen or ...
متن کاملSentencing guidelines, judicial discretion and plea bargaining
The United States Sentencing Commission was created to develop federal sentencing guidelines, which restrict judicial discretion and were found to increase the average sentence length while leaving unchanged the likelihood of resolution through plea bargaining. A game theoretic model is developed in which a sentencing commission may impose guidelines or defer to judicial discretion; then a defe...
متن کاملSentencing Commissions and Their Guidelines
Sentencing commissions, administrative agencies charged to develop and promulgate standards for sentencing, were first proposed early in the 1970s and first established in 1978. Of four recent major sentencing reform approaches-the others being parole guidelines, voluntary sentencing guidelines, and statutory determinate sentences-only sentencing commission systems continue to be created. Despi...
متن کاملDoes Alternative Sentencing Reduce Recidivism? A Preliminary Analysis
Traditional sentencing in America by the way of mass incarceration is a three-fold failure: it does not deter crime, it institutionalizes the inmates and it does so at an incredible cost to the state. There are alternative sentencing measures that can be implemented, and have been done so in various states, but there are not enough statistics that show alternative sanctions will reduce recidivi...
متن کامل